Re: VW US Diesel emissions debacle
Posted: Tue Dec 29, 2015 9:10 am
Right. I guess I am just impressed that GM still largely does their own.
Don't be a tool, repair it.
https://www.forums.kevinallenmoore.com/
I just got to that part (at the end). Clearly, this was done to game the system.Adam wrote: They detect the driving cycle and switch which emissions model they use in the S/W which ends up under injecting urea, hence increased emissions.
Slightly lower operating costs with reduced urea consumption?kevm14 wrote:What I don't understand is what the advantage is. How does injecting less urea really help VW sell a more appealing product? Does urea injection also reduce fuel economy and power? I didn't think so. But perhaps conversion efficiency requires certain engine parameters (like a catalytic converter in a gas engine requires a stoichiometric AFR). And perhaps those parameters (like in a gas engine) preclude ideal power or fuel efficiency.
What's particularly damning is that in the alternative low urea mode, the emissions reduction efficiency checks are disabled! In other words, emissions system efficiency falls so far that the car should set a check engine light on itself, but it doesn't.
The CCC runs a very tight ship (schedule-wise). I will poke around to see if they recorded it an uploaded it separately. Don't hold your breath.kevm14 wrote:They had to cut the Q/A???
The slides include the speakers' email addresses for Q&A.Adam wrote:The talk page (with links to stuff, like the slides)
https://events.ccc.de/congress/2015/Fah ... /7331.html
"The issue of compensation goes beyond the difference in the legal set-up between the U.S. and the EU and plays a fundamental role in viewing VW as a responsible and trustworthy company," Bienkowska also stated in the letter addressed to Mueller